label

Gangemi, A., Peroni, S., & Vitali, F. (2010). Literal reification. Proceedings of WOP, 2010, 65-66. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2878924.2878933.

* **v1.1.0**: Added new documentation, including annotation properties (e.g., `bibo:doi`, `schema:codeRepository`, etc.), term properties (e.g., `vann:example`, `vs:term_status`, etc.), exemplary competency questions with their respective SPARQL queries, and a Grafoo diagram. Changed prefix from `litre:` to `literal:`.

Sebastian Barzaghi (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-1527)

2011-03-23

Aldo Gangemi (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-2684)

Fabio Vitali (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-5203)

Silvio Peroni (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-4305)

2026-09-16

The **_Literal Reification pattern_** is an Ontology Design Pattern that addresses scenarios in which it is needed to bless particular literals, usually when applying data properties, in order to use them as subjects and/or full-fledged objects of semantic assertions.  More specifically, this pattern promotes any literal as “first class object” in OWL by reifying it as a proper individual of the class `literal:Literal`. ## Examples of use In the following subsections, we introduce some examples to showcase how to use the Literal Reification pattern. The prefixes that are used in all the examples provided below are defined as follows: @prefix : <http://www.sparontologies.net/example/> . @prefix literal: <http://www.essepuntato.it/2010/06/literalreification/> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . ### Making assertions on values A reified literal can be enriched with metadata, such as provenance, which cannot be attached directly to plain RDF literals. :paper-title-en a literal:Literal ; literal:hasLiteralValue "Literal Reification in OWL"@en ; dcterms:creator <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-4305> ; dcterms:issued "2026-09-16"^^xsd:date . :paper literal:hasLiteral :paper-title-en . ### Modelling domains concerning descriptive tags Literal reification allows linking synonyms, shared values, or contextual tagging without duplicating string logic. :tag-ai a literal:Literal ; literal:hasLiteralValue "Artificial Intelligence" ; literal:hasSameLiteralValueAs :tag-ai-alias . :tag-ai-alias a literal:Literal ; literal:hasLiteralValue "Artificial Intelligence" . :paper-1 literal:hasLiteral :tag-ai . :paper-2 literal:hasLiteral :tag-ai-alias . ## Competency Questions Literal Reification can be sed for answering several questions related to literals' context. In the following subsections, some of them are introduced together with their respective SPARQL queries. The prefixes that are used in all the SPARQL queries provided below are defined as follows: PREFIX literal: <http://www.essepuntato.it/2010/06/literalreification/> PREFIX dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> ### CQ1 What is the literal value associated with a given entity, along with the creator of that reified literal? SELECT ?entity ?value ?creator WHERE { ?entity literal:hasLiteral ?lit . ?lit literal:hasLiteralValue ?value ; dcterms:creator ?creator . } ### CQ2 Which distinct reified literals share the exact same literal value? SELECT ?lit1 ?lit2 ?value WHERE { ?lit1 literal:hasSameLiteralValueAs ?lit2 ; literal:hasLiteralValue ?value . FILTER(?lit1 != ?lit2) } ### CQ3 Which entities are annotated with a literal that has a specific value? SELECT ?entity WHERE { ?entity literal:hasLiteral ?lit . ?lit literal:hasLiteralValue "Artificial Intelligence" . }

https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.d7f0a9

2011-03-23

ontology design patterns

literal values

2026-09-16

literal

http://purl.org/spar/literal

The Literal Reification pattern

1.1.0